|
|
|
May 25, 2000
Peter: I understand that You would like to continue in further
elaboration on the topic ‘I am’ versus ‘ego’ and the ‘switching
mechanism.’ Also, I received some questions from Erin Martz of the USA
and Boris Bella of Slovakia. Erin’s questions are as follows: In order to
understand the bridge between the old and new concepts, Swedenborg
described ‘proprium’ as the state of selfishness that exists before spiritual
regeneration. How is this concept distinct from the ego states, described in
The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ, which individuals
need to shed in order to live from their ‘I am?’ Also, in view of the impact
of His/Her New Nature upon all creation, was the concept of ‘conjugial
love’ a necessary concept from You that needed to be discussed at that
time, or was it more of a creation from Swedenborg’s mental and moral
viewpoints (some argued whether it was a divinely inspired book)? In the
concept of conjugial love, Swedenborg discussed the process of a husband
and wife knowing each other first from within then to without, which
reflects a proper spiritual order. Yet, at the same time, many concepts
written by Swedenborg in his book Conjugial Love appeared biased
against women. Was he reflecting the social climate of his day, or was the
concept a necessary step to take to bridge The New Revelation’s discussion
of the process and meaning of sexuality in the positive state? End of Erin’s
questions.
Boris Bella’s questions are as follows (I am translating them): In Dialog
130 the concept of Universality-Of-It-All was discussed. I would like to
know from the position of multiversal meaning, how could it be useful for
anyone to have a need to bring to one’s attention anything at all in the
next cycle, which was experienced during the current cycle of
time/state/process, by him/her entering the Universality-Of-It-All and
re-experiencing and recalling everything needed to be experienced and
remembered about what happened in the previous cycle, if everyone in the
entire Creation learned what not to choose and how not to be and if the
idea of rejecting The Lord Jesus Christ as the only Source of eternal life
will be excised and eliminated from the minds of all sentient entities in
Creation? And with this is connected another question: Can we know
about how the utilization of the Universality-Of-It-All will be for the
eternal learning of sentient entities, who participated in the current cycle
of time (and who had already experienced what not to choose and how not
to be and who learned not ever to choose the idea of rejection of the true
life of The Lord Jesus Christ) or what does it mean about the possibility
that entities will be learning again and will be reminded again, what not
to choose into their open memory? By the way, what do we know about
memory as such? Will each newly created sentient entity in the new cycle
of time/state/process be experiencing the process of learning about the
non-life of the negative state from the Universality-Of-It-All, so that the
idea of rejecting the true life or wanting to experience non-life of the
negative state would have no place in the fullness of the positive state even
as the learning process, which will be available in the Universality-Of-It-
All? End of Boris’ questions. How would You like to proceed in this
respect?
The Lord Jesus Christ: Let us first elaborate some more on the issues
of ‘I am,’ ‘ego,’ ‘you’ and ‘switching mechanism’ (Mirko’s original question
as recorded in Dialog 141). For the human conscious mind it is extremely
difficult to conceptualize or apprehend such theoretical constructs as ‘I
am,’ ‘ego,’ ‘you,’ ‘switching mechanism’ and similar seemingly abstract
concepts. There is nothing tangible about them in the experiential mode
of the human mind. Their manifestation takes place or is reflected in
everyone’s behavior, attitude and style of life. Yet, these terms or
concepts are very important to properly apprehend in order to establish a
most needed and desirable position from which everyone chooses to
function. Who or what is the coordinating and/or controlling factor
among them? Who or what is responsible for the decision-making process
and the consequent outcome of any acts, behaviors, attitudes,
relationships or whatever you have? Is there something within the
totality of the system of the human mind or human individuality that
has such an important role or function? I am precluding, at the moment,
from this elaboration any other sentient minds, positioned in the positive
state because, in their case, they lack fully active ego states, which would
dominate and rule them or their decision-making process. What they
have though, is the potentiality for the development of ego states. This
potentiality stems from the idea that they may, if they wish and choose
by their own free will and choice, reject Me as the only source of their
life, as well as of any life. In such potentiality is rooted the possibility of
activating the ego states within them. Of course, if they were to choose
that, in that case, they would find themselves in or they would fall out
into the negative state, acquiring the same structural design of their
minds that anyone else has in the negative state and human non-life.
At this point however, we’ll be talking only about the human mind or
human individuality because within that mind or individuality the so-
called abstract constructs in the form of ‘I am,’ ‘ego,’ ‘you’ and ‘switching
mechanism’ are the most pronounced and the most tangibly manifested.
Once again, the question is if there is anything within the human system
(or system of any sentient mind) that transcends any of these
manifestations and that is in full control over them, and thus, is
responsible for all decision-making processes and their various outcomes.
Do you remember something which was recorded in one of the earlier
Dialogs about My Absolute Nature and how there is that integral part of
My Nature which cannot be named, or uttered or comprehended or
apprehended by any relative sentient mind? It was called ‘Unnamable
Core of My Absolute Nature’ which is conceived as an integrative,
originating, maintaining, regulating, ruling and controlling Source of all
and everything in being and existence and pseudo-being and pseudo-
existence (in pseudo-being and pseudo-existence, with the exception of
originating or being their source). If you take into consideration that the
original relative sentient mind was patterned and structured by the
Absolute Design of My Absolute Sentient Mind, then, in that case,
logically speaking, it must similarly contain something within its
structure that transcends the totality of all components of that mind and
which integrates, coordinates, rules, controls, regulates and directs all
aspects of that mind in all its manifestations. The human mind is not
excluded from this rule.
To the extent that this factor is unnamable and incomprehensible in Me,
to the same extent you can conceptualize that this transcending state
within the sentient mind’s system, as well as the human system, is
unnamable and incomprehensible likewise. At least, as far as the
sentient mind’s and human’s systems are concerned, it was not so until
the present time. In My Absolute State and Condition, because of its
Absolute Nature, this factor will remain unnamable and
incomprehensible to eternity. On the other hand, in the case of the
relative sentient mind and human mind, because of their relativity, some
aspects of this transcending factor may be named and, to a limited sense,
may be comprehensible. As you see from these facts, we are talking here
about something new and different. Up to this point, no one has known
that the sentient mind, as well as the human mind, contains something
within their systems which can be conceptualized as a transcending,
coordinative, integrative, controlling, regulating and ruling factor of
everything of which those systems consist. But now is the time to reveal
this important fact. The timeliness of this revelation was determined
that someone of My representatives, in this case Mirko, came up with the
question of this important magnitude and significance.
This transcending factor within the system of sentient entities, as well as
humans, has a direct relevance and correspondence to My Unnamable
and Incomprehensible Core. Without its being in place, all components,
aspects, parts, or whatever you have, within the sentient entities’ and
humans’ systems, would disintegrate and fall apart. The transcending
position of this factor also serves as the ‘switching mechanism’ between
this or that component, aspect, degree or level of each sentient entity and
human. Only from the position of this transcendence, when you overlook,
coordinate, rule, regulate and determine each and every particle of the
mentioned sentient systems, can such switching take place. So, how can
you conceptualize this factor in human terms? Is it possible to find
anything in the human vocabulary that would be able to give you some
idea of what we are talking about? If anything at all which transcends all
its conglomerate states, processes and conditions, and which is in the
position of coordinating, integrating, determining, regulating and ruling
them for whatever purpose it has, in that case, it is very difficult, if not
impossible, to find something in the human vocabulary which would be
able to even remotely describe its nature. After all, such a vocabulary is
within the human system and is one of the many components of that
system which is ruled by the mentioned transcending factor. You cannot
very well describe anything which transcends your comprehensive
abilities and which is a derivative of some secondary component within
the totality of your system.
The closest term which can be used for our purpose, and which can be
considered only as an orienting point to the human mind for sensing
what this is all about, would be a tentative term of ‘specific and
unique individuality’ that functions by and has at its disposal all
components, aspects, levels, degrees, parts or whatever you have, of the
sentient entity in general and the human entity in particular; and at the
same time, which transcends all that in exactly the same manner as My
Absolute Unnamable State transcends all and everything in an absolute
sense. This specific individuality can be equated with the term ‘you.’ So,
whenever we are saying, ‘you are responsible and accountable for
anything and everything,’ we mean this specific individuality which
contains everything needed for making right choices and decisions. In
some ways, you can say that everyone’s inborn ability to rationally
distinguish between right and wrong (in human non-life and in non-life
of the negative state), and to choose between them, is the most direct
manifestation of this specific individuality.
In human non-life and non-life of the negative state, although this
specific individuality remains on their unconscious level, nevertheless, in
having the conscious awareness about their ability of choosing, it can be
considered as its direct manifestation. Nothing is more obvious than this
factor. So, whenever we say something like, ‘you are responsible and
accountable for all your deeds or from what position you function
(whether from your true ‘I am’ or from your artificial ‘ego’),’ we are
referring directly to this specific individuality of yours. It is this
individuality that, in the ultimate outcome of its choices, functions and
manifestations, is being judged and adjudicated. Thus, in this sense, it
does not really matter whether anyone in human non-life and in non-life
of the negative state is or is not consciously aware about the existence of
this transcending factor which we tentatively named as ‘specific and
unique individuality.’ Due to the fact that everyone is consciously aware
of his/her ability to choose and to change, by the factor of having this
ability, everyone is functioning from the position of this specific and
unique individuality. After all, this ability is one of the many forms or
means of concrete manifestation of this individuality. This is the reason
why we have said so many times that everyone is responsible and
accountable for whatever is happening in their lives — no matter what it
is and no matter when and under what conditions it takes place.
In its transcending, coordinating, integrating, controlling, decision-
making, regulating, overlooking and choosing position, the specific
individuality of each sentient entity, as well as each human entity, is
placed in a state of neutrality. This state allows it to direct its energies in
whatever direction it wills or desires. If the choice is for functioning from
the position of its ‘I am’ and the true sentient mind in general (from
within of the Spiritual Mind, through the interior mind to the external
mind), in that case, the choice is to function from the position of the
positive state or from Me. On the other hand, if the choice, for some
reason or other, is to function from the position of the ‘ego’ and fake
pseudo-mind (through its own three aspects), in that case, the choice is to
function from the position of the negative state or from the position of the
typical human nature. In either case, the responsibility always lies in
everyone’s transcending individuality.
As My true representatives on planet Zero, who are receiving the
privilege of knowing these facts for the first time, and who therefore, are
put into a position of direct conscious awareness of the existence of this
setup, you are given an opportunity to regulate your life based on this
new knowledge. The issue here is with what or with whom within you, or
in the totality of your own unique makeup, you want or desire to
establish an identity. Once you know about this transcending factor of
your nature, you may, if you wish, put all your full identity into your
individuality and, from that position, direct its energies only and only
toward functioning from the position of your true ‘I am.’ However, from
time to time, and as long as you are in human life, if there is a need to
function from the position of the ego state in order to provide some
important learning, and in order to illustrate and demonstrate for the
benefit of all, the specific nature of your own specific ego, in that case,
the energies need to be shared with that ego. Without these specific
energies, provided by your individuality, with which you are now in the
state of full identity, nothing can function in your life. However, although
sometimes it is necessary to provide these energies to your ego or to the
manifestation of some aspects of your typical human nature,
nevertheless, you are never to give all those energies to such cause. You
may share them only to a certain degree. Should you direct all such
energies only to the ego’s cause, in that case, you would find yourself in
total slavery to the negative state, of which, the way out would not be an
easy one. Instead, the major portion of those energies should be directed
to functioning from the position of your true ‘I am.’ In this case, although
some energies will go into your ego or into the manifestation of the
aspects of your typical human nature — after all, how else could you
fulfill the purpose for which you agreed to be incarnated into the human
non-life and fully exhibit the nature of this non-life — because the
majority of them will go to your true ‘I am,’ in this arrangement, from the
position of being identified with your specific individuality, you will
control all aspects of your ego functions and manifestations. Thus, in this
case, your ego will not control and rule you, but you will rule and control
your ego.
In order to accomplish this goal, you are advised to ask Me to take over
your specific individuality and, from that position, to make it possible for
you to regulate, control, rule, direct, coordinate, make choices, make
decisions and everything else, from My Absolute Specific and Unique
Individuality in all Its Transcending Aspects. In this sense, in order for
you to be able to establish your full identity with everything contained in
this transcending individuality, or with your individuality as such, you
first need to request Me that I help you to establish such an identity
based on My Absolute Identity in this respect. Only from the position of
the Absolute State, is such accomplishment possible. Once you submit
your petition for such an identity, based on the motivating and
intentional factors for such a petition, I will provide you with all
necessary means to succeed in this effort. This provision will be partially
actualized either during your current human non-life, while you are still
on planet Zero, or completely, after you leave it. However, no matter
what the case may be, your petition in this respect will serve as a
foundation on which, at some time or other, such full identity will be
established to eternity. In the interim, if needed and necessary, a partial
identity will be granted to you so that you may successfully control your
ego states and the negative aspects of your human nature in general.
What will count in this respect, is your honest and sincere desire
to always function only from the position of your true ‘I am’ and
that for that reason, all energies of your specific and unique
individuality be primarily directed to the function of your true ‘I
am.’ At this point in time, as long as you are in your human non-life, not
much more can be required or even accomplished. This was an agreed
upon arrangement. And this is all that I wanted to contribute today.
Should a need arise in the future to elaborate more on this important
topic, we’ll do so.
Peter: Thank You very, very much for this prolific revelation. May we
proceed with the answers to the posed questions?
The Lord Jesus Christ: Yes, Peter, we may; and we’ll proceed in the
sequence as they came. First of all, let us address the term, coined by
Swedenborg, ‘proprium.’ As you know, this term is a Latin word, the
meaning of which approximates something that relates solely to one’s
own, without any regard to anyone or anything outside of that own. In
Swedenborg’s conceptualization it denotes a state of selfishness where no
considerations are given to anyone else’s well-being but only to one’s
own. At the time of Swedenborg, the term ‘ego’ had not been defined or
established. This term was introduced to human psychology later on at
the end of the XIX century. The meaning of both terms — ‘proprium’ and
‘ego’ is interchangeable. For that reason, you can say for sure that
proprium and ego, in our conceptualization, are the same as far as their
true meaning and content are concerned.
A somewhat more complicated situation exists with Swedenborg’s
concept of ‘conjugal love’ (Swedenborg’s spelling is ‘conjugial’. However,
the English dictionary does not contain this particular spelling). Before
going into the reasons for Swedenborg’s introduction of this concept into
his writings, let us, for a moment, consider the true meaning of the word
‘conjugal’ or ‘conjugial.’ This term, once again, derives from the Latin
word ‘congugalis.’ Actually, this word consists of two separate words.
‘Conju(n)x = spouse. ‘Con’ = spouse. Ju(n)x derives from the word ‘jugum’
which means yoke. Thus, what you have here is that the true meaning of
conjugal or conjugial denotes spouses in yoke to each other. In your
modern terms this meaning is reflected in the words ‘marital bond.’ What
is this meaning telling you? If you carefully analyze this meaning, then
you have to conclude that in the true reality of its meaning, there is no
such thing as true conjugal or conjugial love. Instead, it is a pseudo-love
based on slavery, possessiveness, self-exclusivity, mutual dependency,
ulterior motivation and similar, mostly all negative factors. Whatever
has such a negative connotation, cannot be of true love. Therefore, it does
not derive from the positive state or, in this case, from Me. Of course,
this does not mean that the two people who voluntarily (in some cultures,
even involuntarily) enter this bond or yoke, could not or would not have a
deep love, appreciation, respect or friendship toward each other.
However, this condition with them and between them has nothing to do
with the so-called ‘conjugial love.’ Instead, it originates or derives from
their positive inclinations and from the state of their true ‘I am.’ That
they yield to the requirements and expectations of their culture or society
in this respect, for whatever of their own individual purposes and
reasons, is an entirely different story.
Do not forget what was indicated about this issue in the Big Book and in
some previous Dialogs. The typical human marriage has a negative
connotation and was invented in the Hells. That this is the case, you can
see from the fact that the majority of the most violent and murderous
crimes are committed within marital relationships or between spouses
(spousal abuse, for example). Unless any relationship is founded on true
love, respect, appreciation, mutual understanding, kindness, tolerance,
patience, acceptance, compassion, empathy, independence, and more
independence, and similar all positive characteristics, the so-called
cultural and social requirements and expectations in this respect, in
many instances, will only lead to disaster or tragedy.
So, as you see from this description, the so-called ‘conjugial love’ is
nothing but a trap set up by the forces of the negative state in order to
keep humans in mutual slavery and interdependency. As you know, in
order to make marriages stand, no matter what, they were proclaimed by
all religious systems, as well as by all legal laws, as being holy,
sanctioned by God. They were put into a position of the most desirable
and needed state, condition and process. How else could the negative
state spread its sphere of influence and domination? Take, for example,
the spiritual falsity of the statement which indicates that the two, who
enter in the marital bond, become one and no longer two. What is the
true meaning of this falsity and how did it come about? Is it possible at
all to relinquish one’s unique individuality, spirituality, mentality,
difference and one’s true ‘I am’ in order to merge with someone else and,
as a result, to form a totally different state? To relinquish something like
that equals destruction of that specific, different, unique and non-
duplicable component that I endowed on each individual, and by which
each individual is who he/she really is. In that case though, should
something like this be possible at all, My Creation would be deprived of
something very important, related to My Absolute Nature, which is
available only and only by and through any specific individual in his/her
relative condition. In some ways, it would equal existential suicide. The
negative impact of such a possibility would be incalculable. You have no
idea what could happen in this case.
Now, the origin of the meaning of the expression of ‘two becoming one’
stems from the distortion and purposeful falsification of the original
concept of unification, integration, oneness and absolute equality of all
principles of masculinity and femininity and femininity and masculinity.
These principles in no way relate to gender or to the unification,
integration and oneness of two different individuals — one being a male
and the other being a female. Instead, it relates to every individual’s own
internal masculinity and femininity and femininity and masculinity as
contained in both a male and a female. Thus, to repeat again, this
concept has no relevance to the external gender. However, in the process
of invention, activation, establishment and manifestation of the non-life
of the negative state and human non-life, these concepts and states were
utilized by the original pseudo-creators in such a manner that they
applied it to any two individuals of the opposite gender-sex. It was a very
convenient utilization for them because it opened up a door toward
establishment of something which was/is inconceivable within the true
life of the positive state — slavery, repression, suppression of one’s
individuality, difference and uniqueness, mutual dependency or
dependency on the externals (after all, two people are positioned in
different external states, never able to occupy the same space or be in the
same state of internals) and similar all negative factors.
At the time of Swedenborg, as well as throughout the entire history of
humanity on planet Zero, until not so long ago, such a concept as each
individual containing within himself/herself both principles —
masculinity and femininity or femininity and masculinity, regardless of
gender, were not known or considered at all. It was not until C. G. Jung
came up with this idea that the factor of such a structural design of the
sentient mind or of all sentient entities started to penetrate the conscious
awareness of humans.
So, what was it that Swedenborg talked about in this respect? As you
know, it was clearly stated in the books of My New Revelation that
Swedenborg and his writings represent the nature and content of the
transitional period which was instituted at his time — from the Dark
Ages to the Ages of Enlightenment or from the old to the new. As you
remember from My New Revelation, any transitional period contains in
its ideas something very new and different with a considerable retention
of the old concepts, interpretations and understanding of all factors
which ruled the old. Because of that, some of Swedenborg’s writings
reflect this situation. At the same time however, Swedenborg was the
first one who recognized the absolute integration of all principles of love
and wisdom, good and truth and positive works (in his term, charity) and
faith and their spiritual correspondential relatedness to individuals. His
problem in this respect was that he ascribed these attributes in the
manner which was conceived by the old conceptualization in that, such
attributes were contained in their separation — one was in a male and
the other in a female. In order to accomplish their necessary integration,
the concept of conjugial love was invented by him based on the
misunderstanding of the fact that it is not a male and female that need
to enter such a state but it is masculinity and femininity and femininity
and masculinity within each individual, regardless if he is a male or if
she is a female, that need to enter the state of their full integration and
unification.
So, in response to Erin’s question in this respect, we can say that both
assumptions are correct: Swedenborg reflected the social climate of his
day and at the same time, he was building a necessary bridge to The
New Revelation’s conceptualization of the process and meaning of this
issue in the positive state (without his being consciously aware at that
time that this was the case). However, the majority of the content of his
book Conjugial Love, was the result of his own mental and moral
viewpoints. Thus, it was not directly inspired by Me. This book of his did
contain some elements of truth, albeit in a somewhat distorted condition,
which he deduced from those books that were divinely inspired.
You have to understand one important thing: Being human, by the factor
of your typical human nature, you all have a strong and almost
irresistible tendency to adhere to, or at least to be influenced by all
traditions, customs, social mores, habits, expectations, etc., which
underlie the pseudo-life of your country, society, community,
neighborhood and their respective cultures. It is almost impossible not to
be contaminated by such requirements. Swedenborg did not escape this
situation. Being also a typical human, he, as everyone else, yielded to the
customs of his time. And you also, frequently, yield to the customs of
your time. As long as you are in human life, such situations are
inevitable. For that reason, there will always be a tendency to interpret
many things as well as behave, act, relate, talk, etc., from the position of
these cultural mores, customs, traditions, expectations or whatever you
have there in such an abundance. Objectively speaking, it will be very
difficult and intolerable for you, under the condition of your typical
human non-life, to be any other way. In some way, your survival in your
typical human non-life depends on your ability and willingness to go
along with or to adjust to whatever your society or country or community
or culture, or whatever, either locally or globally, requires and demands
from you.
So, if your society requires and expects from you, at some time or other,
to get married and to have children for example, there will be a very
strong pull to abide by these requirements and expectations. You do not
want to find yourself in the position of being an outcast, a pariah or a
weirdo at whom everyone points their fingers. You want to blend in, to be
an integral part of life in your community. Such tendencies as, for
example, to get married and to have children, are almost genetically
engrained in you or in your human nature so that you would really yield
to everything that your society demands and expects from you. To be that
way for humans is as natural as breathing. Who can resist something so
natural as that?
This is how the trap of human non-life was set. It is not easy for anyone,
including someone as enlightened and inspired by The Divine as
Swedenborg was, to avoid being in such a trap. In some way or other, you
will reflect this condition of human non-life in anything you experience or
adopt. It will become an integral part of whatever you say or write or
consider. This is the reason why, Peter, many years ago, before you knew
that you would be the transmitter of My New Revelation, I told you that
human life consists of myriad and myriad distortions and falsifications
and that it is built or founded on them. Otherwise, the typical human
non-life would not be possible at all. Of course, you, as My true
representatives, are not excluded from this situation. The only difference
between you and all others, including Swedenborg, was that by means of
My New Revelation, you became consciously aware of these important
spiritual facts. This conscious awareness puts you into an entirely
different position and degree of responsibility and accountability.
Because of that, although, from time to time, it is impossible for you not
to fall into this trap, you may establish within yourself an entirely
different attitude about all of this. Your responsibility in this respect is
not that much in being able to totally and completely avoid this trap, or
not behave, act, relate or whatever in accordance with your society’s
demand and expectations (which is utterly impossible anyway — as long
as you are in human non-life), but, internally, in never identifying
yourself with anything which human non-life, in the form of its cultural
mores, demands and anything else it expects from you.
So, how do you do that? Take, for example, your need to be married in a
typical human fashion and following your marriage, to have children. In
some instances, it is impossible to avoid going through all the traditional
and customary rituals surrounding marriage and raising children.
However, you may reject internally or within you, any tendency to
identify yourself with the same conceptualization of these conditions or
establishments as the majority of humans do. You look at them and their
meaning from the position of all the principles of My New Revelation.
Because you will not identify yourself internally with anything you have
to do or the way you have to be while living within the frame of all
demands and expectations of human non-life, nothing of that nature will
be attributed or appropriated to you. In that case, following your
departure from human non-life, and after entering the true life of the
positive state, such things will fall away from you permanently and you
will not be held responsible and accountable for anything of that nature.
Of course, it would be a totally different story if you were to fully and
completely identify yourself with all such expectations and demands as
the majority of humans do. In that case, you would consider them as the
only feasible and possible truth and lifestyle, and that nothing else or
different could be and exist. Should anything like that become an
integral component of your thinking and identity, you would become fully
responsible and accountable for them. Thus, you would be judged
accordingly.
Your enormous advantage, as compared with everyone else, is that, you
have in your possession, by the means of My New Revelation, the real
truth about all aspects, facets, conditions, states, dynamics, processes
and nature of human non-life as well as of the non-life of the negative
state in general. I can assure you about one very important fact: No one
else in the entire history of humanity, including all My prophets,
disciples, followers, Swedenborg or anyone at all, had in their
possession and understanding these facts or these truths about
human non-life and non-life of the negative state. Because of that
they had absolutely no idea what the human non-life (for them human
life) was all about or why it was possible at all for the negative state and
its brand of non-life to occur in the first place. Being in such a position,
everyone before you assumed that human non-life was a real life and
that, for example, in Swedenborg’s case, it was the only life at all from
which life of all sentient entities in the positive state derives because
human life was considered by him to be a nursery for all other forms of
life in the positive as well as in the negative state, respectively.
With such a false or grossly distorted understanding about human non-
life, and with everything related to it, it was not difficult at all to
consider such non-life as holy and the only one possible. And not only
that, but to consider it as deriving from God Himself/Herself Who made
all humans in His/Her likeness and image. Up to this point, or up to the
point of the availability of My New Revelation, it was permitted to hold
such a view about human non-life as being the only true life from which
everything else derives. The reason for this permission, as you know, was
in giving a chance for the full manifestation, learning, illustration and
demonstration of all aspects of this non-life to take place as compared to
the true life of the positive state. As you also know, if humans were to
know from the beginning what their non-life was all about, they would
never go along with being in such an awful, despicable, miserable,
atrocious and abominable life. In that case though, the questions
originally asked could never be answered, and as a consequence, all
sentient minds would be plagued with uncertainty about anything at all.
However, with the availability of My New Revelation, all fables,
fantasies, illusions, falsities, distortions and everything else about
human non-life, as well as about the non-life of the negative state, are
being dispelled and put into the proper perspective. You, as My true
representatives, by the mode of your own personalized and
individualized lives in accordance with the principles of My New
Revelation, are in the process of establishing an important condition in
the human non-life which will eventually lead them toward full
awareness about these facts as related to their so-called life. In that
moment (in a non-time meaning!), they will be able to unchoose their
mode of non-life and instead, they will choose the true life of My positive
state. Once they become fully aware of these facts, it will signify that
everything about and in human non-life, will exhaust its usefulness, will
serve its purpose and will no longer be needed or necessary. At that
point, the human non-life in all its negative aspects will be no more.
Peter: To tell You the honest truth, I cannot wait for this to happen.
Sometimes I feel so sick and tired about everything in human non-life, or
about all aspects of my own personal and individual human nature and
the fragility of my human body, that I almost suffocate.
The Lord Jesus Christ: This is fully understandable. However, do not
forget about the importance of your mission that you have from Me (not
only yours, Peter, but everyone else’s who reads these Dialogs). Also,
please, do not forget about the temporality and transience not only of the
negative state and human non-life, but about the very brief tour of duty
that each of you as separate individuals have on planet Zero and in your
human body. How long does your human non-life last? In comparison
with all other modes of life, which may last to eternity (especially and
particularly in the positive state), the duration of your human non-life is
as nothing, as almost non-existent. It is like a very small fraction of a
blink of an eye. On your planet, who lives longer than 100 hundred
years? You can almost count those humans on the fingers of your hands.
So, do not despair; your human non-life will soon pass. Even if you were
to live another 66 years in addition to your current 66, Peter, it would
still be only less than a blink of your eye. Why do you think I permitted
for anyone to enter human non-life under these conditions (to live such a
brief and insignificant time)? Among many other things, I established
such a mode during anyone’s tour of duty on planet Zero, in order not to
have anyone suffer for too long from all the miseries, pains, discomforts,
and everything else of the very negative nature with which human non-
life is so abundantly infested.
So, in essence, you may conceptualize your human non-life as something
which is of such an insignificant duration, time-wise, that in the scheme
of events which could last many millennia or even forever, it is as if it
does not exist. Of course, as mentioned in one of the earlier Dialogs,
when you are in the midst of your human time flow, or within that very
small fraction of an eye blink, it seems to you that you are in your
predicament, whatever it may be, almost endlessly — as if it does not
have any foreseeable end. It is a matter of perspective — from what
position you look at your human situation. From the objective mode of
perception, everything in it is as if it all happens simultaneously and at
the very same time. In this perception, therefore, the duration of your
human life equals one nanosecond, for example. For that reason,
everything that you experience during your human non-life happens
within the frame of this nanosecond. On the other hand, in your
subjective mode the duration of your human non-life, from the position of
your own subjective and tangible experience, lasts for many years or for
the time allotted to your being on planet Zero in your human body. Even
though it is not easy to think in the objective mode of how you experience
and perceive your human non-life, you are advised, whenever you are in
some kind of miserable or painful or unpleasant and frustrating
situation, to be aware of this fact and to think, if you can, in the objective
mode. It is quite possible for you to train yourself in thinking in this
mode. If you can accomplish it, it will make it much easier for you to bear
your human non-life.
Let us now address Boris’ questions. Why is it necessary to sometimes
bring to anyone’s attention or to know about something which happened
during the current cycle of time, or which relates to the negative state
and its human non-life or to the idea that one may reject Me as the only
Absolute Source of Life, if all that was taken out of everyone’s mind and
memory, so-to-speak, and placed into the Universality-Of-It-All for
eternal learning? Or after everything about what not to choose had been
properly answered and tangibly illustrated? There are at least two
important reasons; or better to say, at this time, only two reasons can be
revealed and expanded upon. One, you have to distinguish between the
state of knowing something and having that something as an integral
part of your life with which you have to constantly deal on a daily basis
and which therefore, considerably influences or even complicates your
life, demanding from you your attention and your energies. Thus, to
know something or about something or to have ideas about something is
not the same as having that something in your life as its integral
component. Once any knowledge about anything is acquired, it cannot be
eliminated to eternity. It can be dropped from one’s memory or from one’s
conscious awareness but it cannot be erased from the totality of the cache
which contains all available knowledges and which is placed into the
Universality-Of-It-All.
If such a thing as permanent elimination of any acquired knowledge and
experience from being and existence were to be possible, in that case, no
permanent learning about anything could take place. You would have to
constantly acquire the same knowledge over and over again. This would
prevent you from acquirement of any new knowledge because you would
be bogged down in relearning the same thing on a continuous basis. So,
as you see, it is one thing to have knowledge and ideas, and experiences
related to them, or to have full access to that knowledge, to those ideas
and to their individual experiences — whenever needed and necessary,
and it is another thing entirely to be in a position of acceptance of and
identifying yourself with them to the point that they become the ruling
force of your individual and personal life. Why would it be necessary,
from time-to-time, for anyone to have any need to enter the Universality-
Of-It-All and to remember or to re-experience anything at all which
would be eliminated from the sentient entities’ memories and which
would no longer have a place within any future cycle of time?
This need relates to the structural design of any sentient mind, which, in
its relative condition, reflects the Absolute Structural Design of My
Absolute Sentient Mind. This design requires that any knowledge,
experience, state, process and anything which was, is and will be
acquired, is constantly available to anyone in order to prevent the
possible redundancy and backward move or regression or waste of energy
on seeking or making an all-out effort to discover any knowledge,
experience, state, process and anything else that has already been
discovered, acquired and established. In other words, such availability is
necessary in order to preserve a continuous spiritual progression of
everyone in being and existence.
You have to understand one thing: The structural design of any sentient
mind is such that it constantly seeks to discover new knowledge, new
experiences and new everything else. In the process of any such
discovery, the sentient mind, first of all, searches out the Universality-
Of-It-All in order to determine whether any such knowledge and
experience, or anything else at all, needed for his/her purpose, is already
available. Secondly, during this search, by the experiential mode of its
nature, as he/she goes through all available knowledges and experiences,
he/she may recall anything related to this cycle of time/state/process or to
his/her personal life for the purpose of evaluation and establishment of
whether anything at all from that cycle of time/state/process could be
useful as a foundation on which new discoveries could be accomplished.
This situation does not mean at all that anything recalled or re-
experienced during such a search will be adopted or allowed to penetrate
his/her mind or to take hold in his/her life to the point that he/she would
be forced to make any of that a part of his/her unique identity. Once
anything of that nature is placed in the Universality-Of-It-All, by that
factor, it can never become an integral part of one’s identity nor can it
ever have any adverse influence on one’s current life. It is available only
in the form of knowledge or ideas and their experiences as such, without
being taken over by them. Such is the arrangement of this setup.
Let Me remind you of something in this respect: In the original
structural design of the sentient mind, which in its relative condition
reflects My Absolute Sentient Mind, there is an area which can be called
— Multiversal Consciousness. This area is directly plugged into the
Universality-Of-It-All from which it receives any inputs needed for
whatever purpose. In relationship to each other, they are in a constant
communicative mode. In one sense, everyone’s Multiversal Consciousness
contains all knowledges and experiences, as well as everything else, that
have ever been acquired since the time when My Creation was created or
put into its process. You can consider this area as one’s own individual
and personal key to the Universality-Of-It-All which opens the door to
everything contained in it. The difference between the two is in that, in
the Universality-Of-It-All, there is a timelessness factor involved. What
it means is that everything in it exists as if it is happening over and over
again in its own true reality at any given moment of its occurrence. On
the other hand, in everyone’s personal and individual Multiversal
Consciousness the same things are in the state of available knowledge
and experience but not in their actual occurrence. In order to make that
knowledge and experience available for knowing and experiencing them
in their true nature, the way they are in their essence and substance and
in any current experiential mode of their occurrence, the Multiversal
Consciousness, through its direct connection to the Universality-Of-It-
All, by the very nature of the Universality-Of-It-All, is able to acquire the
very essence and substance of any such knowledge and experience, or
whatever is needed in this respect, in the most tangible and experiential
mode. This possibility reveals to anyone who enters that mode, the true
nature and structure of any knowledge and experience which occurred
prior to any current cycle of time/state/process. That way, rediscovery of
something which had already been discovered, does not need to take
place. By this factor, eternal spiritual progression can flow
uninterrupted.
The second issue in this respect relates to the concept of relativity. As
you know, every sentient entity is relative and not absolute. Because of
that, as you remember from the Big Book, no one can be perfect in an
absolute sense. This condition establishes a peculiar possibility which
can lead anyone to making occasional errors. The multiversal law
requires that anyone who makes any error has to bear the consequences
of such erroneous tendencies. In order to avoid any possibility of
identification with one’s erroneous conclusions, whatever they may be,
and by that factor prevent the reactivation of the negative state, the one
who makes such errors is placed momentarily into the Universality-Of-
It-All where he/she may experience all consequences, outcomes and
results not only of his/her own personal errors but any and all other
errors that have been committed in any other cycles of
time/state/processes (with all their own consequences, results and
outcomes). The reason why such an all-inclusive experience may take
place (if needed and necessary), is for preventive measures. It helps
him/her to avoid making any errors in the future which had taken place
prior to his/her time/state/condition. In the broader sense, it helps to
prevent the reoccurrence or reactivation of the negative state and of the
typical human non-life in its negative aspects. Of course, new and
different errors could occur because of one’s imperfection.
However, based on the experiential knowledge, pulled out of the
Universality-Of-It-All and his/her own individual and personal
Multiversal Consciousness, one is made able to correct them on the spot,
so-to-speak. So, basically, these are some reasons why it will be
necessary for everyone, from time to time, to re-experience or recall
anything at all which is needed at each particular time/state/process. As
far as the new sentient entities are concerned, the entities who will be
created in any succeeding cycle of time/state/process, will be relative
likewise. For that reason, everything explained above, will apply to them
as well. They will need to have their own knowledge about anything
which happened during any previous cycle of time so that, first of all,
they will have no need to waste their energies on reinventing something
or re-experiencing something which had already occurred; and secondly,
they would have no need to ask questions as related to the meaning and
experiences of the negative state and human non-life and to the content
of the original idea about the right to reject Me as the only Absolute
Source of their lives and what the consequence, results and outcomes of
acceptance of that idea would be. Thus, having access to all those
knowledges and experiences would preclude any reactivation of the
negative state and its human non-life to eternity.
The concept of memory, from our spiritual standpoint and not from the
standpoint of human psychological knowledges in this respect, has a
direct relevance to and affinity with your personal and individual
Multiversal Consciousness. They can be equated. In this respect, memory
is the condition or the integral component of the overall sentient mind for
the purposes of retention of all knowledges and experiences that have
been and will be occurring during the entire history of being and
existence of the sentient life. They are needed for the purpose of
preservation and continuation of everyone’s spiritual progression so that
no need would exist to reinvent or re-experience something which had
already been invented and experienced before; that is to say, that there
would never be a possibility for any type of regression to occur. And this
is all that can be revealed at this time about Boris’ questions.
Peter: Thank You very much for this revelation. As You are aware,
toward the very end of recording this Dialog, I received a somewhat
lengthy letter from Dan Barba which contains somewhat lengthy
questions that he asks about Your Personal relationship toward us at
two of their levels — from Your Absolute State and from our relative
condition. Do You wish to provide any answers to his questions at this
time?
The Lord Jesus Christ: Although his questions are important and
meaningful, the answers to them are premature to reveal at this time.
There is a mystery here, the knowledge of which could be spiritually
dangerous for you to know under the presently existing conditions. We’ll
reevaluate the possibility of My answers at a later date. There is
something else that needs to occur first. As for now though, you need a
longer break and to do a different work. Until then — if needed and
feasible at all.
Source: DIALOGUES WITH THE LORD JESUS CHRIST PART 2.