ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY FOURTH DIALOGUE

March 14, 2000

Peter: I understand that You would like to continue in the discussion of the issues raised in the previous Dialog (123) as well as to give an interpretation to and explanation of the real meaning of the statements made by the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church. Am I correct?

The Lord Jesus Christ: Yes, Peter, you are right. First of all, we need to discuss further the issues of life as such, in general and the individual, unique and different ‘I am’ and its own private life, in particular. After that we may address the significance of the Pope’s statement — if any.

As you remember from the previous Dialog, one of the most important questions that every created sentient entity had in mind at that time and non-time, was whether their understanding and definition of life is the correct one, and whether their individual, unique and different ‘I am’ is really so. In this respect, the issue was not only whether their life is the life of the positive state but whether what they experience is really life as such. How can you know whether what you have and what you experience is really life and whether your perception that you are in possession of the true individual, unique and different ‘I am’ is really the correct one? Against what could you compare what you have and who you are in your ‘I am’ if nothing different is available to you in order to make such a comparison?

There is a dependency factor between life and everyone’s ‘I am.’ As you remember, the conscious awareness of having self-awareness, that is to say, of being aware that you are ‘I am,’ constitutes the awareness as containing life as such. After all, if I am aware that I am in my own being and existence, therefore, I must be alive or have life in order to be able to conceive and perceive myself as having life. So, whenever we are talking about life as such and about ‘I am’ as a carrier of that life, it is obvious that life cannot be and exist without its carrier, and the carrier of that life cannot be and exist without its life. Hence, the mutual dependency. Of course, that was not the question. We are emphasizing this issue here only for the purpose of giving you a clear perception and understanding, that life and ‘I am’ are inseparable and one without the other is not conceivable or deducible. So, in this case, the question was whether life as such is really life or something else and, thus, by approximation and interdependency, whether ‘I am’ is really ‘I am’ or something else. Can something like non-life and non-‘I am,’ as well as non-being and non- existence, be and exist in its own condition and process without having any connection or relevance to that which is called life and ‘I am?’ And if it can, what would it be like as compared to something which is called life and ‘I am?’ Is such a condition possible at all?

The problem with this issue for the sentient mind is in the fact that not being absolute in its own state, condition and process, and not being the source or the origin of its own life and its ‘I am,’ by that factor, it cannot have the absolute knowledge about whether what it experiences as life and ‘I am’ is really so or not so. It could even be something else. You see, Peter, not being the source or the origin of its own life and of its own ‘I am,’ the sentient mind finds itself in the possibility of doubting about whether it really has life and possesses its own ‘I am’ on which the perception and apprehension of life is possible and conceivable. The central issue and problem here is in the factor of not being its own origin or source of its own life and ‘I am.’ If you are not the origin or source of yourself and your ‘I am,’ that is to say, of that in you which is called life, then how can you be sure that what you have is really life? After all, you are not the one who gave yourself life and your life was not from, by, in and of yourself. Instead, you have a clear perception that it came and was imparted on you from Someone else. That you can conceive yourself as ‘I am’ at all, or that you can say the word ‘I’ at all, was, thus, dependent on Someone Who is that way in, by, of and from His/Her Absolute ‘I AM.’

Because in no way are you the origin or source of that life in you and of that ‘I am’ in you, you have no experiential foundation or basis on which you can acquire any true knowledge of what and how it is to be the origin or source of life and your own ‘I am’ from yourself, in yourself, by yourself and of yourself. Such a condition can and may induce doubts into your mind about whether what you have and what you experience is really life and your ‘I am.’ So, how do you go about finding out whether life as such and your ‘I am’ are really what they are supposed to be or whether they are something else entirely? After all, there is nothing else out there or within you which is different from and independent of that which is called life in general and your ‘I am’ in particular. Under these conditions, you are stuck with only one mode of perception and experience. One mode, by the logic of being the only one, does not give you any other choice or option, or any other experience. Thus, you have nothing else available which would give you the assurance that what you have and the way you are is really the true reality of your experiential mode of having life and being your true ‘I am.’ Hence, doubts in your mind about these important issues.

To live in the state of continuous doubts, no matter to what such doubts are related, means to be uncertain about anything at all. To have them, means not only to limit your creative efforts but the life energies themselves are being wasted, limiting your ability to fully utilize them for some other, more creative purposes and, most importantly, for your growth, betterment and spiritual progression. In that case, your doubts are in your way of experiencing life and your ‘I am’ in their fullness and completeness. Any dispensation of energies for something which is not integral to or for such an establishment, precludes the experience of life and one’s ‘I am’ in their fullness and completeness. To live like that is a poor approximation of true living.

In order to circumvent this grave situation, it was necessary to permit the sentient mind to experiment with some other options. Because, in this case, the issue was whether life as such is really life and whether the ‘I am’ of that life is really the ‘I am,’ the direction which this experiment had to take place, was to invent and establish something which does not derive from, is not originated in or is the source of that something, in this case of life and ‘I am.’ To prove the point that the sentient entity really has life and its own ‘I am,’ and that it is capable of originating something or being the source of something from, by, in and of itself in exactly the same way as that sentient entity and its life and ‘I am’ originated from Someone else, it embarked on the invention, development and production of that something which had nothing in common or which was not coming from the same source and origin from which that sentient mind came. In other words, it invented, developed, produced and put into motion something which came from its own self. And because the sentient entity, by the factor of its own creation from and by the Absolute Source, became relative to that Absolute Source, being relative in its nature and ‘I am,’ it invented, developed and established something which became relative to its own relative condition, state and process. This is how relative to only relative came about, to become and to begin its own development, manifestation and exhibition. It became a foundation on which the non-life of the negative state and its human life could be established.

In assessing and evaluating this process, it becomes clear that if you want to invent, establish and manifest something which is entirely different from that which you have and what you experience as life and your ‘I am,’ then, in that case, in order for it to be different, having nothing in common with the available modes of being and existence, it must preclude from its nature anything at all which is contained in the nature of the currently available and experienced condition. Because it has nothing whatsoever in common with the original mode of experiencing life and ‘I am,’ and because the original mode was called the true life, the positive state and the true ‘I am,’ for that reason it becomes non-life, the negative state and false pretentious ‘I am,’ designated as the ego. Thus, the replacement of the genuine and true life, of the genuine and the true ‘I am,’ and of the genuine and true positive state, with the non-life, with the negative state and with the ego, came to its adverse fruition.

If the positive state is founded on the true life, and on the true individual, unique and different ‘I am,’ in that case, the negative state must be founded on non-life and on ego states which are common to all and everything situated in the non-life and which precludes any notion of individuality, uniqueness and difference. Once such a non-life was established, and once it began the manifestation, illustration and demonstration of its true nature, all sentient entities in being and existence, were given an opportunity to compare their original life and their original ‘I am’ with something which does not contain anything from the original. For that reason, they now have tangible knowledge of what it is to be in the original and the other non-original condition. Because they are able to analyze the non-original non-life and clearly see what its nature is, it gives them a logical foundation on which they can make appropriate conclusions about the nature of the true life and its true ‘I am,’ and the nature of non-life and its ego states (the ego states were replacements for the original ‘I am’). By the process of this analysis, they are able to be convinced that the original life and the original ‘I am’ are the true life and the true ‘I am.’ Therefore, from this conclusion it logically follows that they truly have life as such and that that life is rooted in their unique, different and individual ‘I am.’ For that reason, their ‘I am’ is truly ‘I am’ and not some kind of unrealistic construct that has no bearing in any reality.

So, as you see from this example, the genuine and original ‘I am’ needed to be repressed and forgotten and replaced with something which would have nothing in common with it. Thus, it was replaced with the ego (with the stinky ego, as you like to say, Peter). If the original and genuine ‘I am’ stems from the Absolute ‘I AM,’ which was defined as Absolute Positiveness, then the ego would have to have the totally opposing quality. The opposing quality to the Absolute Positiveness is total and complete negativeness. As you see, we did not say — absolute negativeness. The reason for this is in the fact that this negativeness did not originate in the Absolute Positiveness. As mentioned many times before, the Absolute Positiveness cannot contain anything of negativeness because, otherwise, it would not be Absolute Positiveness. If the negativeness did not originate from the Absolute Positiveness, in that case, it cannot have anything within its nature which is contained in the Absolute Positiveness and its ‘I AM’ or any other positive ‘I am.’ For that reason, logically speaking, the ego does not contain anything positive or good. Therefore, its nature is purely and completely negative, which opposes anything which is good and positive as contained in the true life and its ‘I am.’ If this is so, and the nature of the ego’s non-life clearly testifies that it is so, then, in that case, the ego is a carrier of non- life of the negative state and its human life. And because its origin can be traced to the relative sentient entities, its non-life has only relative duration and cannot stay forever in the same way and manner as the true ‘I am,’ the origin of which can be traced to the Absolute Life and its Absolute ‘I AM’ — The Lord Jesus Christ.

Now, why are we talking about these seemingly obscure, unimportant and abstract concepts that have no apparent or obvious relevance to anything presently going on or to your own individual lives and your ‘I am’? As you remember from The New Revelation of The Lord Jesus Christ, it was stated there (Chapter 7) that before the negative state and its non-life and human life could be permanently and eternally eliminated, the process of its activation needs to be recapitulated from A to Z. The reason for this requirement is in the fact that, in order for that non-life, and everything related to it and its nature to have a chance to demonstrate and illustrate all its aspects, it was necessary to conceal the reason for its invention, activation and realization. Otherwise, no proper learning for the purpose of comparison between life as such and its ‘I am’ and non-life and its ego could take place. Because of this requirement, it was necessary to repress the proper knowledge about who or what was the originating source of this non-life and its ego states. As you know, many various surmises existed or came to everyone’s attention about this issue. However, none of them were/are true. If you are not aware of this origin and the reasons for the need to have something like the negative state and its non-life and ego states, you cannot eliminate it because its origin is put in the wrong source.

For that reason, at one point in time and non-time, when everything about this issue is about to be fulfilled, the reasons for, origin and the source of the negative state and its non-life and ego states are gradually, in certain steps and increments, being revealed. One of the major purposes for which My New Revelation is given to all in the positive state, and for which it is made available to everyone in the negative state and to all humans, is to bring to everyone’s attention why the negative state and its non-life, human life and their ego states were permitted to be invented, activated and put into motion, and who or what was their originating source.

The point here to realize is that not having proper knowledge about these facts, having only distorted or totally false views about them, makes it impossible to do anything about the process of their total and eternal elimination. If you have distorted or false knowledge about anything, because it is distorted and false, as long as you have it, the negative state cannot be eliminated. After all, the non-life of the negative state and its ego, as well as of human life, is rooted in distortions and falsities. They cannot have any other concepts because their pseudo-being and pseudo- existence was built on denial, rejection and elimination of anything contained in the positive state, its true life and their ‘I am.’ Therefore, if the positive state, or life as such, and its ‘I am’ are founded on the principle of truth and rightness, in that case, the opposing factors could be nothing else but distortions and falsities. For that reason, as long as you have distorted or false views about these facts, you are in the negative state, you are the negative state, you have non-life, and instead of ‘I am,’ you have ego states.

One of the most important works in this respect, which is being conducted by the members of the New Universe and by the converted pseudo-creators, as well as by you, My true representatives on planet Zero, is to bring to everyone’s attention in the non-life of the negative state and in the human non-life, and making available to everyone, the factor of ‘I am’ versus their ego. Everyone in the negative state and human life is fallaciously convinced that their ego is either interchangeable with ‘I am’ or it is the true and the only possible ‘I am.’ At this time it is brought to their attention that it is not so and that the true life has never been rooted in their ego. And not only that, but their ego is the source of many, if not most, of their problems. And at the same time, they are being given an opportunity to dispense with their egos, by rejecting the pseudo-fact that their ego has any true life in itself and by itself. Whoever acknowledges and agrees with the process of this dispensation, is put into a condition under which his/her original ‘I am,’ buried and repressed deeply in their unconsciousness, but which, at the same time, is the source of their ability to conceive themselves as being alive and having life, — although originally, they denied this fact — to be awakened and to become the true identity of their own uniquenesses, differences and individualities; thus, to begin their life, once again, in the true life and their genuine ‘I am.’

What you have to understand clearly, Peter, in this respect is that, in the original process of the invention, activation and establishment of the non-life and non-‘I am,’ in order to be able to succeed in this effort, it was necessary to repress, suppress, encapsulate and arrest the true ‘I am’ and put it into an inaccessible mode as related to the conscious mind so that no one in the non-life would have any knowledge and access to most important information about who they are and what the true life is all about. As you know, only from the position of the true ‘I am’ the clear knowledge of one’s identity, of one’s uniqueness, difference and individuality, as well as of the meaning of one’s life, as well as what life in general is all about, could be conceived, understood, apprehended, recognized and accepted. So, as long as you are aware of and have full access to your ‘I am,’ no possibility exists to invent, activate and establish any other type of life, that is to say, non-life, but only the true life of the positive state. In order to succeed in this effort, for the purpose of having a comparison between life as such and its true ‘I am’ on one hand, and non-life and non-‘I am’ on the other hand, it was necessary to somehow dispense with that ‘I am.’ However, it was not sufficient to only dispense with it, or to be more precise, to close any access to it, but it was very vital to substitute it with something which would resemble, to a certain extent, the original ‘I am’ but which, in its true nature, would have nothing in common with the nature of the true ‘I am.’ And not only that, but which would contain everything in its nature that would be opposing anything of which the true ‘I am’ consists. Only by such an invention, could the possibility for activation and establishment of non-life and its ego, or fake ‘I am’ come to its adverse fruition. As you see from these facts, the ego became a fake ‘I am.’ The reason why we are designating the ego as the fake ‘I am,’ is because it was necessary to deceive everyone in the non-life by convincing them that their ego is, in fact, their true ‘I am.’ After all, from the position of their ego, they are able to say ‘I am.’ But saying it is one thing and being that way is a totally different matter. That their ego has nothing in common with the true ‘I am’ can be discerned from the fact that no one in human life and in any region of the Zone of Displacement and all its Hells has absolutely any proper and correct knowledge, or no knowledge at all, of who they are and why they are where and when they are. As you remember from Update 15 in the Corollaries…, if they were to know clearly who they are, in that case, their individual non-life in particular and the non-life of the negative state in general would simply cease to exist. Or it could not be invented, activated and established in the first place.

As you see from these logical facts, it is obvious that in order to do anything about the negative state, non-life, human life and their ego states, you first need to rectify this situation about not properly and correctly knowing what, why and who was the originating source of non- life and ego states. This is the very first round in the process of this elimination. This round is the most needed foundation on which this process of elimination is being accomplished. In human life, you, as My true representatives, are to learn about these facts so that you may establish the necessary condition for making them available to the entirety of humanity. And not only that, but also to the entirety of all those pseudo-worlds where this non-life and egos are flourishing and thriving. Whereas for humans proper, and all other inhabitants of planet Zero, this knowledge, for the time being, will be in a state of availability, registered in the deep recesses of their unconscious mind, for those creatures and others in the Zone of Displacement, who are connected to you and who acquire this crucial knowledge by the process of your reading this information, it is registered directly in their conscious mind in the same manner as for you, My representatives, who read these words. Also, for everyone in the positive state, in all its worlds and dimensions, this information is immediately registered in their conscious minds (of course, they don’t have an unconscious mind!).

So, as you see from these facts, although at first glance whatever is being revealed here and in the previous Dialog (123) and in some other Dialogs, and in The New Revelation in general, which deals with this issue, seems to be abstract and intangible, seemingly without any practical application, in the true reality of its content, the opposite is true. It is the most needed information for all in order to begin the process of the elimination of the negative state, its non-life, human life in its negative aspects and ego states. And you, as My true representatives, are the carriers and reflectors of this vital, crucial and important information and knowledge. You have no idea, from the standpoint of your human mind, what it means to herald and carry this knowledge and information to all who are connected to you. Remember this and do not underestimate our philosophical discussions. And this brings us to the issue of the Pope’s statement. As you know, a few days ago the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church asked for forgiveness of all humanity for all the sins (atrocities and abominations) that the Roman Catholic Church managed to commit during the last two thousand years. Is there any spiritual significance in his statement? And if there is, what is it and how does it relate to whatever is contained in these Dialogs and in My New Revelation in general?

Two important aspects and meanings could be derived from the Pope’s statement. The first one relates to something which was repeated many times in these Dialogs and which concerns your work of making all the information and knowledges contained in My New Revelation available to humanity. The first impact of this availability, which is a precursor of the total and complete elimination of the negative state and human life in its negative aspects, was the admission by the Pope that his church sinned or committed unspeakable atrocities against humanity (in whatever form and degree). If something like the church, which supposes to be the embodiment and carrier of the most important aspects of the spiritual life and its truth and good, is capable of such atrocious and abominable deeds as the Roman Catholic Church committed during the two millennia, then, in that case, that church in particular, and religion in general, is the invention of the Hells and does not contain any truth or any good within its own establishment. This is the very first grain of truth which is being brought to everyone’s attention in human life and in the negative state. That this step was possible to make at all in the first place, is thanks to everything which was revealed in My New Revelation and especially in these Dialogs. Without their availability, it would be utterly impossible to conceive the idea by the Pope, that his church, which has been considered infallible in its activities and doctrines, could have sinned. This is the positive outcome of his statement and admission, as well as the availability of My New Revelation and these Dialogs. And more will be coming in this respect. Now the entire humanity, through the statement of the Pope, has conscious knowledge about the truth of the matter, seeing things as they are and not as they were fed by their respective religion.

The second aspect has a negative connotation. Although the Pope admitted — and asked humanity for forgiveness — that his church sinned, nevertheless, he failed to bring to everyone’s attention the reasons behind his church’s atrocious deeds. And what is behind such abominable behavior and deeds as those committed by the Roman Catholic Church, as well as all other churches? It can be found in their doctrines, teachings and dogmas which contain nothing but pure distortions and falsities about all spiritual issues; about Who I AM and what My True Nature is all about; about the nature of the positive state, the nature of the negative state and the nature of the human life. Such distortions and falsities fully justify any deeds that the respective churches have been committing and will be committing as long as they hold on to their respective doctrines, teachings and dogmas. The Pope did not show any inclination to denounce the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrines, dogmas and teachings. And this is a trap of the negative state and the renegades. As long as you are holding on to all these distortions and falsities, nothing internally has changed. Only external change is made possible by such proclamations and admissions. However, such change does not count because that change was not internalized and therefore, has no power for real change to take place. You can consider this situation as a deception of humanity because now the negative state will seem to be so sincere, virtuous, humble and remorseful over everything that it unleashed on the entire Creation. And because the causative reasons and factors for all its atrocities and abominations, as reflected in the life of the Roman Catholic Church, as well as in all other churches, are not being brought to anyone’s attention and consequently are not being removed and replaced with the Absolute Truth, no true changes are taking place. In fact, the opposite is true: Now by admission and proclamation of their sins and by being seemingly repentant, they only reaffirm in the mind of humanity, that their teachings, doctrines and dogmas are correct and they do reflect the true reality of the positive state, of the spiritual principles, of My True Nature, of the meaning of the negative state and of the meaning of human life. After all, if they were not, they would never be able to come up with such a positive and desirable admission and proclamation.

So, as long as all churches continue to hold on to their teachings, doctrines and dogmas unabated, no matter how many proclamations and admissions they make about their sins, and no matter how repentant they seem to be, nothing has changed in their mode of life. In fact, by this factor, they are very potently contributing to the pseudo-winning of the negative state on planet Zero and elsewhere. And this is the mentioned trap set up by the renegades by the means of the Pope’s statement and proclamation. It is heralding the installment of the final phase in the process of the pseudo-winning of the negative state. Therefore, don’t be taken in by any of that. The negative state has always been in the business of trying to convince people how good and virtuous it is. Otherwise, people would not accept it. A good example of this effort can be found in something like exorcism, performed by some Catholic priests and others on so-called possessed people. This issue was originally raised by Dan of New York, shortly before your physical problems and misery started, Peter. The way you have to understand such deeds and exorcism is in the manner as described above in those two aspects. The positive connotation of such an act, no matter who performs it and from what doctrinal position it is being performed, is in the fact of the illustration and demonstration that the negative state truly exists, and that its members are able, in some limited cases, to possess some humans who agreed, by their prior agreement, to illustrate this fact. At the same time, this fact illustrates that one can be freed from such possession and thus, one can begin to lead a normal life without being restricted by such possession. This is the positive aspect.

However, such acts have more negative aspects than positive ones. The way you have to understand this statement is in the fact that the negative state always needed to present itself to its followers as a charitable and virtuous establishment. Otherwise, it could not be accepted by anyone. So, in this respect, it allows its demons or evil and negative spirits, whatever the case may be, to enter a human body for the sole purpose of being exorcised by the means of religious rituals so that, first of all, the negative state could be perceived only in a positive connotation; and secondly, and most importantly, to confirm the verity of all teachings, doctrines and dogmas, on which the respective churches are built. After all, if a priest, or any other member of the clergy, by using the doctrines, dogmas and teachings of his/her respective church, is able to exorcise a demon or an evil and negative spirit from the human body, especially if it is done in the name of God, or in this case, in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit/Ghost, or Jesus Christ or whatever names they use, then, in that case, all the teachings, doctrines and dogmas of their respective churches must be true. Otherwise, the exorcism would not work.

And this is how the trap by the negative state is set up in order to keep humans and other creatures and sub-creatures of their domain in thick darkness about the real truth related to My Nature, to the nature of My positive state, to the nature of the negative state and to the nature of human life. For this reason, the rulers of the negative state allowed not only that such exorcisms could be successful, but, in fact, they devised them to be that way in order to perpetuate their cause ad infinitum. So, it is not as if one faction is trying to defeat another faction of the negative state, as the case could be in many other instances, but, as you see from the above, it is a well-devised subterfuge in order to keep everyone in their domain and in human life as they are, without allowing them to see any truth of this, or any other matter. So, to summarize, unless any such acts are done from the position of My New Nature and by the means of My New Revelation, they are of purely negative origin and their purpose is to make it impossible for anyone in the negative state and human life to convert to the positive state. Such acts are specifically devised for this purpose. If they work, no one would even think about conversion to the positive state because, by the factor of the seemingly positive aspects and outcomes of such acts, they would consider themselves to be in the positive state. Concrete examples speak a billion times louder than any words. After all, if such exorcisms are allowed or even set up by the rules of the negative state, then, in that case, the negative state is truly the positive one. And this is how the negative state’s subterfuge works — by presenting to people the negative state as the positive one so that no one would have any inclination or desire to change anything about their pseudo-life or non-life. Again, I repeat, do not be taken in by any of that. There are many such devices, concocted by the members of the negative state, and now by the renegades and their minions, by which they are trying to keep their members and humans where they are without even considering an option that some other type of life, totally different from their non-life, really exists or is available for conversion to it. The issue here is very clear: It all boils down to the distortions and falsities contained in all teachings, dogmas and doctrines of the respective churches and religions. Because such teachings, dogmas and doctrines are presented to their members as inspired by or coming from God, Jesus Christ, Allah, Buddha, Krishna or whatever name they use for that purpose, in their mind and view, they must be irrefutable and true in all its aspects. Nothing else is feasible or even desirable. As long as people hold on to incorrect, distorted and false views about My True Nature and everything related to it, as well as to who they really are and what their nature is, as well as what the nature of the positive state, the negative state and human life are all about, their membership in the negative state, or in non-life and in non-‘I am’ is assured on a continuous and uninterrupted basis.

And here comes the role that you, as My true representatives on planet Zero, are to undertake. By being in possession of this important knowledge, related to all proper spiritual factors of life as such, and related to My New Nature, to My Absolute ‘I AM’ and your true ‘I am,’ to the nature of human life and the negative state in general, and by applying it in all aspects of your life, you are setting up an important example for all humans and other creatures and sub-creatures of the negative state, about what the truth of this matter is all about. By doing that, you are preparing them to recognize and to see, at one point in time, that their views about all these matters were pure distortions and falsities. By making a proper comparison between what you have and what they have, they will be able to make a right decision in this respect and give up their non-life, their non-‘I am’ — their ego, and to reacquire the true life, life as such, and rediscover their true ‘I am.’ By such rediscovery, they will see very clearly that they belong to the positive state or to the true life and thus, ultimately, to Me. As you see from these facts, your role in this respect is very important, more important than you can surmise by your conscious mind or by the human aspects of your nature. As long as you continue in studying and applying everything contained in all sources of My New Revelation in your personal, individual, unique and different life, you are fulfilling your mission for which you agreed to be on planet Zero in the typical human life. And this is all I wanted to convey to you all at this time.

Peter: Thank You very much for this revelation. I enjoyed and appreciated it very much. Is there anything else that You would like to convey today?

The Lord Jesus Christ: You are welcome, Peter. No, not today. We’ve had enough for now. You need to rest because of your fragile physical condition.

Source: DIALOGUES WITH THE LORD JESUS ​​CHRIST PART 2.

INTRODUCTION | SPIRITUALITY | CONTACTS | MAIN SITEMAP | BACK